EYLEA® (aflibercept) Injection Submitted for EU Marketing Authorization for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema

Regeneron Reports Third Quarter 2013 Financial and Operating Results

Regeneron Announces Upcoming 2013 Investor Conference Presentations

Regeneron Named Top Employer in the Global Biopharmaceutical Industry for the Second Year in a Row

Razor blade necklace Metallic True Rocks 0vIjiWUO

Sanofi and Regeneron Report Positive Top-line Results with Alirocumab from First Phase 3 Study of a PCSK9 Inhibitor for LDL Cholesterol Reduction

Regeneron to Report Third Quarter 2013 Financial and Operating Results and Host Conference Call and Webcast on November 5, 2013

Regeneron to Present Phase 3 Data for EYLEA® (aflibercept) Injection in Diabetic Macular Edema at Upcoming Retina Society Meeting

Regeneron Announces Appointment of Robert E. Landry as Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

EYLEA® (aflibercept) Injection Approved in Europe for the Treatment of Visual Impairment Due to Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion

Neko Monokel Eyewear Acetate Sunglasses in Tortoiseshell Womens Reiss dtJ0EQD

Retardation. 1. Unexpected strength of impression: a ) Unexpectedly strong sound . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.073 b ) Unexpectedly weak sound. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.171 2. Interference by like stimulus (sound by sound) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0.045[ Mens Cotton Pocket Square Branches Black amp; White by VIDA VIDA gNycdq
] 3. Interference by unlike stimulus (light by sound). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.078

It seems probable, from these results obtained with elementary processes of mind, that all processes, even the higher ones of reminiscence, reasoning, etc., whenever attention is concentrated upon them instead of being diffused and languid, are thereby more rapidly performed.[ 35 ]

Still more interesting reaction-time observations have been made by Münsterberg. The reader will recollect the fact noted in Chapter III (p. 93) that reaction-time is shorter when one concentrates his attention on the expected movement than when one concentrates it on the expected signal. Herr Münsterberg found that this is equally the case when the reaction is no simple reflex, but can take place only after an intellectual operation. In a series of experiments the five fingers were used to react with, and [p. 433] the reacter had to use a different finger according as the signal was of one sort or another. Thus when a word in the nominative case was called out he used the thumb, for the dative he used another finger; similarly adjectives, substantives, pronouns, numerals, etc., or, again, towns, rivers, beasts, plants, elements; or poets, musicians, philosophers, etc., were co-ordinated each with its finger, so that when a world belonging to either of these classes was mentioned, a particular finger and no other had to perform the reaction. In a second series of experiments the reaction consisted in the utterance of a word in answer to a question, such as "name an edible fish," etc.; or "name the first drama of Schiller," etc.; or "which is greater, Hume or Kant?" etc.; or (first naming apples and cherries, and several other fruits) "which do you prefer, apples or cherries?" etc.; or "which is Goethe's finest drama?" etc.; or "which letter comes the later in the alphabet, the letter L or the first letter of the most beautiful tree?" etc.; or "which is less, 15 or 20 minus 8?"[ 36 ] etc. etc. etc. Even in this series of reactions the time was much quicker when the reacter turned his attention in advance towards the answer than when he turned it towards the question . The shorter reaction-time was seldom more than one fifth of a second; the longer, from four to eight times as long.

To understand such results, one must bear in mind that in these experiments the reacter always knew in advance in a general way the kind of question which he was to receive, and consequently the sphere within which his possible answer lay.[ Grey Hat for Women On Sale Hat for Women On Sale Grey Wool 2017 M Gucci 2017 M Gucci XLyWIFMnED
] In turning his attention, therefore, from the outset towards the answer, those brain-processes in him which were connected with this entire 'sphere' were kept sub-excited, and the question could then discharge with a minimum amount of lost time that particular answer out of the 'sphere' which belonged especially to it. When, on the contrary, the attention was kept looking towards the question exclusively and averted from the possible reply, all [p. 434] this preliminary sub-excitement of motor tracts failed to occur, and the entire process of answering had to be gone through with after the question was heard. No wonder that the time was prolonged. It is a beautiful example of the summation of stimulations, and of the way in which expectant attention, even when not very strongly focalized, will prepare the motor centres, and shorten the work which a stimulus has to perform on them, in order to produce a given effect when it comes.

Copyright © Pittsburgh Transportation Group 2018. All rights reserved.